Thinking and Decision Making Paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Thinking and Decision Making - boundary Paper ExampleGenerally, the teleph genius lineation put emphasis on the intellectual aspect of thinking. In addition, reasoning utilize ideas and meanings enables people to come to conclusions in the form of decisions. In thinking, analyzing the ideas and meanings in different ways involves elements of thought, generating reasoning, and prima(p) to conclusion. The elements of thought include purpose, problem, conclusions, facts, assumptions, concepts, implications, and point of view (Paul & Elder, 2006). People think differently with some thinking systematically being referred to as analytical thinkers, whereas others think intuitively. Generally, people think with either the right or left hand hemisphere of mastermind dominance, though scholars encourage use of both hemispheres. According to Marquis & Huston (2008), people with the upper-left- brain dominance are analytical thinkers who like to work with factual data and numbers solvin g problems in a logical and rational way, while people with the lower-left-brain dominance are very organized and period oriented, and like to work in a stable environment, value safety and security over risking. (p. 16) base on the brain dominance, four different thinking styles exist, but this paper will discuss plainly three. Logical Thinking Thinking logically and selecting reasoning fallacies from ones thinking and others thinking is the basis of critical thinking. ... Deductive reasoning involves use of syllogism, which is a three-step form of reasoning with 2 incloses and a conclusion. There are three classes of syllogisms the categorical, the hypothetical, and the disjunctive syllogisms. Categorical Syllogisms A categorical syllogism is an argument that involves statements that either affirm or deny that a subject is a member of a certain(a) class or has certain property (Kirby & Goodpaster, 2007, Pg.157). An example of categorical syllogism is as personifys MAJOR PREM ISE completely our teachers are tall MINOR PREMISETom is one of our teachers CONCLUSIONTom is tall. Tall is the predicate in this case because it is the property or class given to the subject found in premise and conclusion. Indeed, syllogisms are valid when the argument from premises to conclusion is accurate. Hypothetical Syllogisms A pure hypothetical syllogism is one in which the two premises, and the conclusion are hypothetical or conditional, and they normally take the form if-then statements (Kirby & Goodpaster, 2007, P.184). disjunctive Syllogisms This is the kind of syllogism that involves use of either or or statements. Reasoning error of affirming a nonexclusive disjunct using or in a nonexclusive manner sometimes involves disjunctive syllogism. Inductive thinking normally begins with a set of evidence or observations or so some members of a class, or about some events (Kirby & Goodpaster, 2007, P.197). base on the evidence or observations, one makes a conclusion regar ding other members of the class or about some events. The conclusion of inductive reasoning is normally highly probable, as they do not follow the observations with certainty. Scientific thinking Scientific thinking involves a structured way of reasoning